This article is reprinted from the newsletter of the First UU Church, Austin, TX, where Lansing serves as Adult Religious Education Staff Member and has responsibility for covenant groups.
The South West UU Conference in Glen Rose Texas was an intense educational experience for Susan Franks and me. We both participated in the Small Group Ministry /Covenant Groups track. It appears the phrases Small Group Ministry and Covenant Groups are used interchangeably among UU Churches. However, we did learn about two different types of Covenant Groups that we had not been aware of: Affinity Groups and Chalice Circles.
Affinity Groups are covenant groups that are based on common areas of interest or affinity. Some examples of these from our church are: Women's Spirituality Group, The Men's Group, The Women in Transition Group, and The Young Adults Group among others. Affinity groups tend to garner a lot of interest when they first formulate. However, over time, they can become somewhat insular-and develop a strong group identity that is less open to change in terms of process and, more importantly, group size. Affinity Groups can be an important part of a Covenant Group program, but if that is all you have, your program is incomplete.
Chalice Circles follow a simple structured group process that allows you to go deeper in an intimate and safe environment with a group of 6-10 congregants who are diverse in age, gender and areas of interest. Chalice Circles are led by a facilitator who is trained and supported by the minister of the church. Chalice Circles break into 2 different groups when the size of a group goes past 10. This ensures that each group provides a consistent level of intimacy, allowing for maximum depth of sharing and listening. Each Chalice Circle session has a set of questions for the group members to focus on for the meeting. How these questions are chosen depends on the church.
The Baton Rouge church in Louisiana has a very robust Chalice Circle Program. Their facilitators attend training and support meetings every month. Their Chalice Circles leaders choose questions from a book of sessions provided to the leaders or from the UU Small Group Ministry Network website, depending on the needs of the group.
One of the most striking elements to the Baton Rouge program is how they approach new members in their church. Potential new church members are required to attend a day long workshop, or 3 nights of classes, where among other things- they experience being in a Chalice Circle together. Being able to share and listen deeply is often what people are looking for from their church experience. While Sunday Worship can be inspiring, you can't experience the deep relationships that tend to happen quickly in a Chalice Circle. At the end of their New Member Orientation, members have a choice to join one of the existing Chalice Circles or form their own if a trained facilitator is available.
The leaders of our conference track stressed that starting and supporting a robust Covenant Group program takes substantial time, effort and commitment from a church. They recommended going through a planning and engagement process that can take more than 6 months before a church is ready to launch a program with trained facilitators and a program coordinator. However, Chalice Circles are one of the best ways to retain members and develop a church culture of deep and respectful listening.
A first step in supporting Covenant Groups at our church is to re-design our new member orientation process. We don't want to re-invent the wheel, so we will work off what we have, and what other churches use, to create a new member orientation that represents our church at its best. The Adult Religious Education Committee has agreed to support this effort with sponsorship from board member Eric Hepburn.
Editor's Note: The training track was led by Rev. Helen Zidowecki, Augusta, ME, Rev. Steve Crump and Diana Dorroh from Baton Rouge, LA, with full support from the UU SGM Network. Lansing is the Adult Religious Education staff member at First UU Church and has responsibility for covenant groups.